In this paper, we shall compare and contrast Freedom in the Family by Tananarive Due to The Autobiography of Malcolm X in the context of the African American struggle for equality. Patricia Stephens Due fought for impartiality throughout the pinnacle of the Civil Rights period. Her daughter, Tananarive, grew up intensely entangled in the principles of a family unit dedicated to correcting anything they perceived as immoral. Jointly, in intermittent chapters, they have printed a paean to the party. The movement’s impoverishments, its anonymous base militia, its achievements, and an insightful assessment of the imminent justice in the nation. Their mother-daughter expedition straddling two generations of resistance is a remarkable tale. Mother and daughter Patricia Stephens Due and Tananarive Due have printed a captivating and enlightening look at the resistance by African-Americans to achieve equivalent privileges.

The senior Due talks of her participation in the “movement” throughout the chaotic 60’s. She initiates the readers to the numerous sit-ins, jail-ins, scheduling conventions, and mingles with the renowned and not so prominent. It is those “unknown” champions that are the disclosure here. Being a neighbor to close by Tallahassee, FL (where a lot of the book’s proceedings take place), she narrates that her eyes were unwrapped to the implication of progress in that town to modifications that would be completed countrywide. Ms. Due inscribes frankly and explains her confidence, and the commitment of her associate “marchers/protestors”. Her assistance as a writer and protester are praiseworthy and essential analysis for those fascinated in the era.

Both the Due mother and daughter rapidly disregard the revisionist olden times of a Civil Rights Movement in the ubiquitous eyes of Dr. King – a monumental formation ditching white in opposition to black. The reader is kept in constant memory that the social rights faction was actually made up of the miscellaneous actions of typically unsung leading actors who offered their living, sacrificed their incomes, and offered their very lives to the root of liberty. The reader is not permitted to judge that the resistance is over, or even to forget that the concern was not and is not Black against White; it is a subject of liberty and fairness – for everyone.

Liberty in the family unit by mother-daughter writers is a description of their family’s participation in the social privileges progress. The book narrates the assistance of their relatives, acquaintances and followers in an autobiographical arrangement. Tananarive Due cautiously shares her individual family record as basis for her inspiration and desirability in the direction of the ideologies of ethnic impartiality. She drew bravery and potency from the illustrations her parents offered in everyday living. She describes the dread, tenseness, blood, panic, and cry that upshot from abundant sit-in’s, liberty travels, demonstrations, and conventions in such specification that the reader feels as if they witnessed them personally.

She talks of her hurting and commitment in sincere ways like the loss of a baby in an election registration scheme. Tananarive’s perspective is that of a daughter existing in the post-social human rights age. Her account recapitulates the obscurity of growing up in basically white localities and learning institutions and of being detested by both whites for being “too black” and blacks for being “too white”. The particulars of her resistance and upbringing remarks of her parent’s lives are uniformly convincing as her mother’s.

This book is predominantly moving since Tananarive goes into immense aspects concerning the outline of CORE and other remarkable proceedings occurring at FAMU throughout the similar age when her relatives attended. She also points out proceedings in other little cities in Florida where other associates of her family resided, thus major passages stir up numerous memories. This piece of writing is in fact an effort of affection and an immense achievement for the Due family unit. It is an exceptional memoir, a striking heritage, and an explicit reminder for its readers!
Malcolm X used up much of his life struggling for equivalent privileges for African Americans. The Midwest, all through this period, is infused by prejudice and ethnically-aggravated brutality that terminates with the assassination of his father and his mother being institutionalized.

After being in a Michigan imprisonment home and finishing the eighth grade, Malcolm shifts to Boston, Massachusetts, to reside with his step-sister Ella. In Boston he promptly becomes implicated in the city nightlife, and lives past his age, wearing showy outfit, betting, taking alcohol and drugs, as well as getting engaged to an elderly white lady, Sophia. Malcolm hits upon a job on the railways, which transfers him to New York, where he inhabits eternally as a part of the Harlem’s hustlers. Malcolm’s assorted jobs comprise running figures, promotion of drugs, navigating white individuals to black brothels, and carrying out armed burglary. When his living turns out too treacherous in Harlem, he moves back to Boston, where he turns into a house robber and is ultimately detained.

In penitentiary, Malcolm converts himself, changing to the trademark of Islam endorsed by the Islam Nation, which had by now transformed several Malcolm’s siblings. Motivated by the conviction, Malcolm discontinues the usage of drugs, reads rapaciously, prays, and studies new languages like Latin and English, and links with the penitentiary discussion group. When he is finally paroled, he starts to live with Wilfred, his brother, and becomes extremely dynamic in the Detroit sanctuary of the Islam Nation, getting authorization to plunge his “white” surname for the figurative “X.” Regardless of liberated slaves’ lawful and opinionated achievements throughout the era immediately after the public warfare, recognized as Reconstruction, they and their family experienced blows to their civil rights in the preceding decades of the 19thcentury. For instance, in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the U.S. highest court gave a judgment that isolation, in the shape of “separate but equal” communal amenities, was legitimate. Endorsed discrimination all over America, particularly in the South, was sustained throughout the initial half of the 20th century.

Distressed from prejudice, financial subjugation, and brutality at the hands of whites, the African American people gathered with their leaders at that time. Marcus Garvey (1887-1940) advocated for a comeback to Africa, opposing that black citizens should depend on their own harmony and generate their individual techniques of empowerment. Garvey’s ferociously autonomist thoughts inclined numerous African Americans, amongst them Malcolm X’s father, Earl Little, a priest who extended Garvey’s thoughts in his little Michigan neighborhood.

Throughout the social human rights association of the 1960s, Malcolm X achieved nationwide and worldwide eminence. Frequently isolating himself from the association’s heads, he was possibly the most contentious head of the era. Malcolm X’s independence and militancy distinguished with the reunion hard work and peaceful strategies of Martin Luther King, Jr. Historians recognize Malcolm X as the religious father of the Black Power lobby group of the late 1960s. At the moment of Malcolm X’s assassination in 1965, his observations and obligations were experiencing immense transformation. He was demanding unanimity and independence for black citizens, whose resistance he analyzed in the framework of subjugated peoples in the entire world. He was as well discarding the uncompromising anti-white discrimination of his initial years.

The Autobiography of Malcolm X is the outcome of partnership involving Malcolm X and reporter Alex Haley. Over an era of some years, Malcolm X narrated to Haley his life account in a sequence of prolonged interrogations. Haley recorded and prearranged the material in the first person, with Malcolm X editing and approving each section. Therefore, although Haley essentially did the inscription, it is sensible to regard the work as memoirs. The piece of writing is one of the most significant factual manuscripts of the 19th century, as it presents precious insight into the mentality of a prominent outline on a basic concern of 20thcentury America. A New York commentator, in 1965, remarked of Malcolm X, “No man has better expressed his people’s trapped anguish.”

The memoirs continue to be pertinent to attempts to battle bigotry. Equivalent rights protesters struggle against subjugation of African Americans rejuvenated Malcolm X’s viewpoints in the 1980s, and Spike Lee made public the film Malcolm X in 1992, soon after the renowned punching of Rodney King, the black motorist, by white police force officials (Haley 9). Thus both the two works focus on the prejudice directed towards the African Americans. Although Tananarive draws her story from family life and the stories told to her by her parents, Malcolm draws her story from personal experience and what happens in his life from childhood, his short political life until the time he is assassinated. They both attempted to battle ethnicity in their works